Posted on

What makes an artist?

How does one become an artist?  Is a person born to it, or do life and circumstances merge to forge an artist?  Is it instinctual, like when a bird builds a nest and knows just how she wants it to be?  Or is it something that can be taught? Perhaps all one needs is a creative spirit and the skill necessary to create can be learned through lessons and practice.  Although this is a complicated question, my simple answer is that it’s not either/or but some of each. Just like Chris, our son seems to possess some natural talent.  When he reaches his screen time limit and is forced to amuse himself in other ways, he often goes straight to the colored pencils and paper. As Chris puts it, “Art was always my thing. I knew it meant something to others when I became the popular kid in art class at my elementary school.”  He may not have been the first picked in the dodgeball teams, but he was definitely the first chosen to draw a favorite musician or movie star (if anyone wants Bon Jovi on the cover of their Trapper Keeper just let us know). Whatever the specific combination of natural talent and learned skill may be, Chris has managed to create some truly beautiful pieces.  

This piece is titled “Eye in the Sky”.  

Posted on

What’s New

Chris has been hard at work in his studio the past couple of months and has recently finished some wonderful pieces that I want to share with you.  Neither has been titled yet; most of the time the title is the very last part of the process. Take a look below.

Here’s one of Chris standing next to the finished piece.  He’s wearing his favorite painting outfit – Marvel t-shirt and sweatpants.  It’s important to be comfortable while creating!

If you have an idea for a title, feel free to email it to  It’s always wonderful to get fan feedback.  Happy spring everyone!

Posted on

The Unexpected Benefits of Art

One of the many wonderful things about living with an artist is that the house is filled with…wait for it…art.  With a few exceptions, the paintings in our house are Chris’. One of my absolute favorites is “The Butterfly Effect”, which hangs in our bedroom.  Almost every night before I fall asleep I look at that piece, even if just for half a minute, and admire it. It’s peaceful and soothing and I always feel lucky that I get to look at it every night.  I can’t prove it, but I have a feeling that it actually helps me fall asleep.

Or maybe I can prove it.  Chris found an article on titled “Looking at Art Could Help Med Students Become Better Doctors”.  It describes a class in which medical students are taught to look at art.  After the class, research found that the students improved their observational skills, were more able to maintain objectivity, and better understood the value of being able to see something from another person’s perspective.  All of these skills enabled them to be better at diagnosing and helping patients. Taking an art class while learning to become a doctor also provided a stress relief and helped them to complete their studies. The article provides an excellent example of how art can positively affect our lives.  Think about that the next time you’re in a doctor’s office. In addition to their hard earned diplomas, they should also hang a good piece of art on their walls. It could be not only decorative, but also consoling. If I could see the painting below the next time I’m in a waiting room, I know I’d feel better.

Posted on

Art in Unexpected Places

Abstract art can be hard to understand.  As I’ve stated many times before, a common reaction to an abstract work is “But, what IS it?”.  If a person fails to understand and connect with a piece it is nearly impossible to appreciate it.  As a non-artist, this is something that happens to me all the time. “Isn’t this work AMAZING!” they say, to which I respond with my most enthusiastic “Uh huh!”, wait for an opportune moment and then pull Chris aside and ask him to explain it to me.  But every once in a while, I discover something that helps alleviate this.

According to the Netflix show “The Toys that Made Us”, Legos are inspired by abstract art.  How cool is that? Legos! The creators chose the iconic bright red, blue, and yellow of the first Legos after being inspired by the work of Piet Mondrian, a Dutch abstract painter most famous for his work depicting squares and rectangles of (shocker!) red, blue, and yellow.  Legos are a big deal in our house. A few new sets were on Santa’s sleigh for our son this past Christmas and he’s barely parted with them since. So the fact that one of our favorite toys was inspired by abstract art is a pretty cool connection. I’ll likely never again look at a Mondrian without thinking of Legos…and smiling.

Check out one of Chris’ latest below.  This one makes me smile too.


“Simple Solution”

Posted on

All I Want for Christmas is…Art!

Spoiler alert: This post is shamelessly self-promoting.  Well maybe not shamelessly. Okay yes, shamelessly but not in the bad sense of the word.  Of course we want to promote Chris’ work with the ultimate goal of selling it; there’s certainly no shame in that.  And what better time to reach out to his biggest fans than the holiday season? So if you’re looking for a unique gift made by a local artist that will make a beautiful addition to your home or office, you are but a click away from a Christopher Murphy original.  Take a look at the works below.

The sizes and prices vary making it easier to find the perfect gift.  There are some that are postcard size while others would fill up a wall nicely.  If you’re in the Charleston area, stop by Havens Fine Framing where Chris displays his work, most of them already framed. You can also buy his work as a print (a poster, basically) on this website.  With all of these options, why not give the gift of original art this season?  Happy holidays everyone!

Posted on

Artists = Good Decorators

As I write this, Halloween is just around the corner (and as you read this, it will have just been over).  We love Halloween in our house; it’s the beginning of the holiday season and it’s a fun night with friends, dressing up in our favorite costumes, and eating TONS of candy.  What’s not to like? We’re lucky because our neighbors also like to celebrate Halloween. We are far from the most decorated house, but we do our best. And by we, I mean Chris.  He does it all, usually, and this year is no exception. He uses his talents that would otherwise go towards his latest painting and makes the front porch look festive and spooky. This is one of the many instances in which I’m very grateful to have an artist for a husband.  I have a hard time with creativity, but it comes so naturally to him. He and our son designed the jack-o-lantern and carved it last weekend. He trimmed the Carolina midnight, which is near the front door and needed to be trimmed anyway, and added the scraps to the decorations.  He tore up a sheet and used it to make tentacles. He picked out the wreath and door mat at Joanne Fabrics (it was my idea, however, to wait until close to Halloween so they would be on sale). All of this will let the neighbors know to come and get some candy at our house and will hopefully make them smile and help them to enjoy the holiday.  Yes, sometimes it’s really wonderful to have an artist in the family. Happy Halloween!

Posted on

Anything you can do I can do better

To find inspiration for this month’s blog, I began reading a book Chris recommended, Abstract Painting: Concepts and Techniques by Vicky Perry.  It was on the first page of the preface that I found just what I was looking for.  She included a quote by Clement Greenberg that I immediately thought was brilliant and was totally jealous that I had not thought of.  He said “…the onlooker who says his child could paint a Newman may be right”, but “Newman would have to be there to tell the child exactly what to do”.  He was referring to Barnett Newman who, according to his Wikipedia page, was a major figure in abstract expressionism.  The quote hit home so well because the criticism “My five year old could have done that” is perhaps the most common one Chris hears.  It’s one of those things that’s definitely not true, yet difficult to put into words exactly why. The crux of the comment is that the skill and expertise in a figurative painting is obvious whereas in an abstract painting, it’s equally obvious that there is neither mastery nor technique.  It’s just a bunch of paint on a canvas that is moderately pleasing at best and void of talent at worst. What this idea gets so wrong is that there IS technique to abstract work (as the book excellently demonstrates), but it may not be obvious. To prove my point, let’s look at two works, one by an actual five year old, and another, one of Chris’ latest.  Here is what a five year old is capable of.

It’s not the best photo,but you can see my son and me and our house.  Cute, right? By contrast, below is one of Chris’ latest.

Both artists completed their works using an easel, acrylic paint, a paint brush, and an idea of what they wanted to express.  The similarity ends there, however. I don’t mean to demean my son’s creation in this exercise (it was a birthday present to me, after all), but rather to demonstrate the ridiculousness of the my-kid-could-do-that criticism.  No. No they could not. It may not be readily apparent, but the technique, skill, mastery, and training that all come together in an abstract painting are absolutely there.

If there are any five year olds who can get into an art school, this may not apply to them.

Posted on

I ♥ Tori

“She knows what’s going on

Seems we got a cheaper feel now

All the sweeties are gone

Gone to the other side

With my encyclopedia

They must’ve paid her a nice price

She’s putting on her string bean love

This is not really happening

You bet your life it is”


The above are lyrics to my favorite Tori Amos song, “Cornflake Girl” from 1994’s Under the Pink.  Can you tell, from these words, why it’s my favorite? Isn’t it obvious what the lyrics mean? In a word, no.  Nope. Not at all. To this day I’m not sure what they mean, really. Song lyrics are like that. They are subjective, which means people see the meaning they want to see in them.  The same song can be truly meaningful to two people for completely different reasons.


The same is true for abstract art.  It’s subjective. People literally see what they want to when they look at it.  It may be the same vision the artist had when creating it or it may be radically different.  In the same way people can connect with weird lyrics (and let’s face it; many of Amos’ lyrics are downright cryptic) people can also connect with a piece of abstract art.  That’s either frustrating or freeing. The comment I often hear about Chris’ work is “But – what IS it?”. Those are the people that tend to get frustrated by the lack of anything figurative in a piece.  On the flip side are the people who enjoy the experience that a piece of abstract art can give them. It doesn’t matter that it’s not defined by the artist because it’s a collaborative experience. What does it mean?  You tell me. Personally it’s why abstract art is my favorite. And it’s why Tori Amos has been one of my favorite musicians my whole adult life. Even if I don’t think her lyrics mean what she does, I still love her songs.  


When creating a painting, Chris says he imagines his works are like classical or instrumental music, without words but full of emotion and feeling.  So…what does the piece below mean to you?

Posted on

Thanks a lot, Google


I watched a segment of CBS This Morning that featured art created by robots.  Art. Created by robots. Artificial intelligence, to be specific. Programmers at Google have figured out how to “teach” computers to make art.  In test after test, people failed to consistently recognize the art made by computers from art made by people. Without being able to identify a specific emotion, I felt an immediate uneasiness about that fact.  And as I continued to watch the piece, it seemed like the computers were making what would typically be categorized as abstract art. Now it’s personal! People couldn’t tell a Pollock from a Dell. Really?!? So in addition to other artists, Chris has to factor in computers giving him a run for his money?  If there was any job I thought was surely safe from competition from our ever improving AI, I thought it would be anything artistic, anything that takes a soul to create and a soul to appreciate.  But apparently not. Apparently, all you have to do is break down the brush strokes and colors into computer-ese and a computer can produce work that rivals best sellers. In fact, they can become best sellers themselves; the segment touted that one computer-created piece sold for more than $16,000.  That’s wonderful; now that computer can afford to take its family on a nice vacation. So now my uneasiness is turning into anger. What gives? Why would somebody do this? And it wasn’t just painting; there are programs in which computers can create pieces of music. A couple of movie makers used it to create small pieces of background music for their films.  If they need a 10 second piece to accompany a short scene, they can have one in no time. No musician required. Don’t worry, they assure me, this won’t replace musicians, but rather allow artists to get a little boost, an easy fix out of a tough spot. These types of programs can help with writer’s block, for example. This simply does not sit well with me. There are some things we should not use machines for, some things that must be created with our hands, hearts, and minds.  Could a computer really create this?

Absolutely not.  Actually, yes. Okay, technically yes, but so what?  A computer can’t look at it with you and appreciate it.  It can’t tell you what inspired it and what emotion it was feeling while the work was being created.  It can’t tell you how it felt when the piece was finished and where it’s next inspiration is coming from.  Once I had (mostly) finished writing this, I went upstairs to tell Chris about it. He had just finished working on the above painting.  I held his hand and we admired it together. He felt proud that he had made it and I felt pride in him.

Take that, Google.