Posted on

I ♥ Tori

“She knows what’s going on

Seems we got a cheaper feel now

All the sweeties are gone

Gone to the other side

With my encyclopedia

They must’ve paid her a nice price

She’s putting on her string bean love

This is not really happening

You bet your life it is”


The above are lyrics to my favorite Tori Amos song, “Cornflake Girl” from 1994’s Under the Pink.  Can you tell, from these words, why it’s my favorite? Isn’t it obvious what the lyrics mean? In a word, no.  Nope. Not at all. To this day I’m not sure what they mean, really. Song lyrics are like that. They are subjective, which means people see the meaning they want to see in them.  The same song can be truly meaningful to two people for completely different reasons.


The same is true for abstract art.  It’s subjective. People literally see what they want to when they look at it.  It may be the same vision the artist had when creating it or it may be radically different.  In the same way people can connect with weird lyrics (and let’s face it; many of Amos’ lyrics are downright cryptic) people can also connect with a piece of abstract art.  That’s either frustrating or freeing. The comment I often hear about Chris’ work is “But – what IS it?”. Those are the people that tend to get frustrated by the lack of anything figurative in a piece.  On the flip side are the people who enjoy the experience that a piece of abstract art can give them. It doesn’t matter that it’s not defined by the artist because it’s a collaborative experience. What does it mean?  You tell me. Personally it’s why abstract art is my favorite. And it’s why Tori Amos has been one of my favorite musicians my whole adult life. Even if I don’t think her lyrics mean what she does, I still love her songs.  


When creating a painting, Chris says he imagines his works are like classical or instrumental music, without words but full of emotion and feeling.  So…what does the piece below mean to you?

Posted on

Thanks a lot, Google


I watched a segment of CBS This Morning that featured art created by robots.  Art. Created by robots. Artificial intelligence, to be specific. Programmers at Google have figured out how to “teach” computers to make art.  In test after test, people failed to consistently recognize the art made by computers from art made by people. Without being able to identify a specific emotion, I felt an immediate uneasiness about that fact.  And as I continued to watch the piece, it seemed like the computers were making what would typically be categorized as abstract art. Now it’s personal! People couldn’t tell a Pollock from a Dell. Really?!? So in addition to other artists, Chris has to factor in computers giving him a run for his money?  If there was any job I thought was surely safe from competition from our ever improving AI, I thought it would be anything artistic, anything that takes a soul to create and a soul to appreciate.  But apparently not. Apparently, all you have to do is break down the brush strokes and colors into computer-ese and a computer can produce work that rivals best sellers. In fact, they can become best sellers themselves; the segment touted that one computer-created piece sold for more than $16,000.  That’s wonderful; now that computer can afford to take its family on a nice vacation. So now my uneasiness is turning into anger. What gives? Why would somebody do this? And it wasn’t just painting; there are programs in which computers can create pieces of music. A couple of movie makers used it to create small pieces of background music for their films.  If they need a 10 second piece to accompany a short scene, they can have one in no time. No musician required. Don’t worry, they assure me, this won’t replace musicians, but rather allow artists to get a little boost, an easy fix out of a tough spot. These types of programs can help with writer’s block, for example. This simply does not sit well with me. There are some things we should not use machines for, some things that must be created with our hands, hearts, and minds.  Could a computer really create this?

Absolutely not.  Actually, yes. Okay, technically yes, but so what?  A computer can’t look at it with you and appreciate it.  It can’t tell you what inspired it and what emotion it was feeling while the work was being created.  It can’t tell you how it felt when the piece was finished and where it’s next inspiration is coming from.  Once I had (mostly) finished writing this, I went upstairs to tell Chris about it. He had just finished working on the above painting.  I held his hand and we admired it together. He felt proud that he had made it and I felt pride in him.

Take that, Google.

Posted on

Collusion (the good kind)

One of the best parts about being a parent is getting a front row seat to watching a person grow and become who they are.  When our son was a baby, we marvelled at all the milestones; his first smile, the first time he rolled over, when he learned to clap, his first word, that amazing look he gave me when I picked him up from daycare that said “Mommy’s here!”.  As he grew older, we began to look for traits that we could trace back to us. Certainly he gets his blue eyes and blonde hair from Chris, as I have neither, but he got my straight hair and he has the Kinney eyes. This is the wonderful stuff that we get to see up close, each and everyday.  There is sometimes doubt as to which of us may have passed down some of his talents, but for certain, he has gotten his artistic ability from the Murphy line. Just like his hair and eye color, there is no way he could have gotten it from me. On a Sunday morning in June, I went to the studio and found the image below.

It filled my heart.  What a wonderful sight!  It is not the first time these two have bonded over art and I know it won’t be the last.  It’s impossible to predict where our son’s talents will take him in life, but the thought of him growing up to be like his Dad is always a happy one.  

Posted on

Just Like Bob Ross!

How is a painting created?  How does a blank canvas become a work of art?  If you’ve ever found yourself pondering these questions, we invite you to keep reading to get an idea of how Chris creates his pieces. (Spoiler alert: It’s not at all like Bob Ross.)

The first step is to decide how big the piece will be.  Sometimes, this requires assembling the canvas. Other times it’s as simple as acquiring the piece of wood.  No matter what the size, he must prime the piece with gesso to make it ready for the first layer.

The next step is to create a color scheme.  Chris decides what colors he wants to work with.  In this case, it was purple, blue, and yellow. Once those are on the canvas, it’s time for the composition.  He must arrange those colors in a way that is visually pleasing.

Third, he finds collage pieces he can include that would blend well with the work.  Chris uses a wide variety of objects in his paintings, anything from toys to pictures to sand.  In this case, it was the scraps of paper below.

The next step is integration.  He blends the color scheme with the collage pieces.  He arranges them on the canvas taking care to place each item in its proper place.

Next comes the layering.  Chris adds more paint and occasionally more collage pieces, but mostly it’s about layering paint to make sure everything ties together.

One of the last steps is assessment.  Is it done? This is perhaps one of the hardest steps for any artist.  This is also where I come in, quite literally since I’m usually called into the studio at this point and asked “Do you think this one is done?”  If the collective answer is Yes, then he lets the paint dry and begins thinking of a title. If the answer is No, then we talk about what’s missing or incomplete.  He may repeat any or all of the steps described above. It might simply be blending in one corner, or perhaps toning down the brightness of one color. In this example, he knew it was finished when it looked like this:


The very very last step is to come up with a title.  Chris decided on “Universal Appeal”.

And that’s it.  There may be no happy little clouds, but he always ends up with a piece he can be proud of!


Posted on

A Pink Masterpiece or a Pepto Bismol Disaster?

Perspective is a major theme in my blog posts, and this post is no exception.  I am borrowing a story from the late, great Jeanne-Claude, wife and one half of Jeanne-Claude and Christo, the famous environmental artists.  Chris and I had the pleasure of meeting them at The Phillips Collection in Washington D.C. in 2007 while promoting their latest creation.  She told a fantastic story about the installation titled “Surrounded Islands” in Biscayne Bay, Florida. (For copyright reasons, I won’t include a picture, but you should take a look:  Not surprisingly, people had extreme reactions to this piece and they tended to be polarized; they either loved it or hated it.  Jeanne-Claude described her interaction with a man who, at the debut, asked if she was the artist responsible. “Yes”, she answered with a little smile, a small reflection of the pride she felt in creating it with Christo.  “Well I think it’s terrible! It looks like someone spilled Pepto Bismol all over the ocean!”. It’s not hard to imagine the smile slowly disappearing from her face. She related that she apologized to the man for her art’s offending him and tried not to internalize the negative comment.  A short while later, another person asked her the same question, was she artist responsible? Again, and this time without the smile, she answered that she was and steadied herself for the criticism. “I think it’s wonderful! It looks like someone spilled Pepto Bismol all over the ocean! How beautiful!”.  I imagine her smile was back and bigger than ever. I wondered, listening to her tell that story, how it could be that two opposite conclusions could be reached from the exact same experience. But that’s the cool thing about art. There’s no right or wrong. You just create and hope that it makes you feel good.  The fact that someone else may get joy out of it is a bonus. When someone likes it so much they buy it, that is a day to celebrate.

Check out the painting below, “Primal Order”.  On a scale of “My 5 year old could have done that” to “Shut-up and take my money!”, how do you rate this one?  It’s got a lot of pink in it…


Posted on


Some kids couldn’t care less about what they wear.  Clothes to them are simply part of life, and an insignificant one at that.  Our son is not one of those kids. The clothes he chooses are of the utmost importance, and what goes on, and more importantly, what will never go on, his body is the source of more than a little frustration in our house (specifically in his room most school days).  To get out the door, make it to school on time, and to maintain a decent amount of sanity in the morning we compromise – a lot. We let him wear the same pants two days in a row and hope that teachers and other school personnel are too busy to notice. We find one pair of pants which aren’t’ too “crinkly” and one brand of socks that touch his feet but not in a bad way and we buy multiple pairs.  We hug him and rub his back and empathize with how awful it is to have to wear a shirt with a tag in it. As he’s gotten older his pickiness has subsided somewhat, but there are still times when there is simply only one pair of pants he could possibly even consider wearing and how in the world could we not see that? A few weeks ago, these were the only pants the universe would allow him to wear.

Since we had so much experience in compromise we agreed to the pants and hoped nobody would judge us for it (at least not too harshly). They are too short for him, he has been wearing them for at least two years, they have holes in both knees (which I have patched but still), and he had already worn them over the weekend.  They are literally the worst pair of pants he owns. Once he had gotten dressed and I was free to rummage through my own closet to find something to wear he came and sat down on the floor and explained his choice.  “I love these pants. They are really comfortable, they have cool stripes down the side, and you can put your fingers in jail!”. He showed me how he could entwine his fingers in the patched up holes. They are the exact same pair of pants, but we saw them completely differently.

Perspective is so important.  Perspective is everything. Below is “Make it Rain”.  Please enjoy it anyway you like.

Posted on

A Porg or a Painting?

In September 2017, Target released their new Star Wars toys to begin promotion of the latest film, The Last Jedi, opening the following December.  Being a family of Star Wars nerds fans, we made plans to get there the very first day they were displayed.  Since I was more excited about the movie than the toys, I let our six year old son roam about at will and watched him as he raced around the aisles exclaiming “Mommy!  Look at this!” over and over.  I didn’t think anyone was capable of having as much fun as he at that moment.  And then a 40 something woman approached the plush doll section and totally and completely geeked out over the Porgs.  (Take a second to Google that if you are unfamiliar, but make sure to come back and read the rest of this blog.)  She noticed me looking at her and took my “Really lady?” glance for a “Wow! How cool!” look and proceeded to ask me if I knew about Porgs.  “A little”, I answered.  She then picked one up and told me all about them.  At that moment she was more excited than our son and my initial eye roll reaction to her turned into genuine approval.  It’s great to get so excited about something.  That’s the way I hope people to react to Chris’ work.  To see it and immediately connect with the piece and want to buy it.  (She bought the Porg, by the way, even though that little guy was $40 or $50.  George Lucas must have a hard time deciding what to do with all his money.)  When Chris is creating a piece he always has a theme in mind and the hope to is communicate something through the work.  The idea is to get people to have that “Oooo, look at this one!” reaction.  I’ve seen it many times and it never gets old.  They may not be able to articulate exactly why, but they know they love it and want it.  If we can put a painting in a home that will admire it forever, that’s a good day.  

Appropriately suited for this post, the painting below is titled “We Are Made of Stars”.


Posted on

The Red Dress

“Mommy, do you know what that is?  It’s a girl, holding an umbrella, trying to open it in the wind and the rain.  And see that patch of blue in the corner?  That’s the rain.  It’s coming!”  This was said to me, quite out of the blue, by our six year old son in October 2017.  “Is it?”, I responded.  “Yes, it is”, he answered with absolute certainty along with a healthy mix of just-so-you-know attitude.  I stared for a while but couldn’t see what he could.  That is the crux of abstract art in general and Chris’ work in particular.  There are an infinite number of possible shapes and images in one of his works, and there is no “right” one.  Everyone who looks at one of his pieces has a unique experience, even if they come to similar conclusions.  In a figurative painting of, say, a tree, a person can look and admire it.  It may remind them of a favorite childhood tree or of the beauty of nature.  But Chris’ work involves more direct involvement since the viewer must actually decide what they are looking at.  It doesn’t even have to be an object; it could be something like anger or happiness.  It’s collaborative, an experience with the artist.  It’s a small journey, one worth going on again and again.  Some of his works have been hanging in our house for years and I am still finding bits that I’ve never noticed before.  The work hasn’t changed, my perspective on it has.  Amazing.

Below is the painting, “The Red Dress”.  It is absolutely one of my favorites.

Posted on

Vermeer, Picasso…Murphy?

It’s 2018 and, just in time for a New Year’s resolution, it’s a chance to begin a new good habit. Each month, I
will be updating this blog so that all of you can keep up with Chris’ latest work.  
Some of you may have already picked up on my use of pronouns and figured out that I am not Chris himself. 
I’m Kelley, his wife and partner in all things. To be clear, I have no artistic talent whatsoever, so I contribute to 
his career in other ways. Starting in 2018, I will be blogging, emailing, and helping Chris to create more of a 
presence online. I hope this blog prevents Chris from getting in line with so many other talented artists that 
died before people discovered them. It’s a sad story that has happened to far too many. They spend their lives 
creating and never giving up, never losing the drive to continue making art, despite little or no critical support.
And they are never discovered, never receive the acclaim they deserve while they live. Especially in this age of 
technology, it’s a needless tragedy. What would you say to a 
not-famous-when-s/he-was-alive-but-super-famous-now artist, if you somehow had the chance? What would 
you ask Vermeer, for example? (I’d probably go cliché and ask who the girl with the pearl earring was.) What 
about Picasso? Would Owen Wilson take a car back in time to buy 6 or 7 of Chris’ paintings? As cool as that 
seems (sort of), my goal is to promote Chris so that he can avoid this fate. Of course he’s nowhere near as 
famous as these greats, but we’d like to get him in as many homes as we can. We want to reach out and 
connect with people to make as many fans as possible. It would be really great if people simply rang our 
doorbell and asked if we happened to have any abstract art lying around that we were willing to sell, but that’s 
like a toddler willing to eat vegetables and go to bed on time; it doesn’t happen. So we’re trying this instead. 
Since you’re already here, feel free to click on the “Gallery” tab and see what’s new.  I’ve been admiring his 
work for more than 12 years and continue to be amazed, delighted, and inspired by it. Check it out!